Sorry, nothing in cart.
Women’s rights activists in the UK are reeling from the Metropolitan Police’s heavy-handed approach at a Saturday night vigil for Sarah Everard, a 33-year old who was murdered while walking home in South London earlier this month.
The man who is accused of murdering her is a serving member of that same police force.
Throughout the day, mourners had flocked to the bandstand of Clapham Common, an area where Everard was last seen, in a tribute to her life. But they also came in an act of solidarity, as an acknowledgement of the shared, omnipresent experience of intimidation, violence and harassment that women constantly face in public spaces.
A series of evening vigils from organizers “Reclaim These Streets” had been planned Saturday across the UK. The main event, at Clapham Common, was cancelled after the Met said they couldn’t go ahead, citing coronavirus restrictions. The organizers asked people to shine a light on their doorstep instead for Everard and for all women affected by and lost to violence.
But by nightfall, peaceful mourners gathered for the socially distanced event in Clapham. Attendees chanted: “This is a vigil, we do not need your services.”
Less than an hour after the gathering began, officers moved in to inform people that they were breaching Covid-19 regulations and had to leave. Then, a predominantly male cluster of officers moved in, using containment and corralling techniques — where officers surround demonstrators to keep them in a particular place, making social-distancing impossible — ordering people to leave, or face arrest and fines.
As police officers forcibly removed women from the bandstand and dropped others face down to the floor in arrest, attendees chanted “Shame on you,” “Arrest your own,” and “Who do you protect?”
In a statement on Sunday morning, the Met Police said they “absolutely did not want to be in a position where enforcement action was necessary,” but that “we were placed in this position because of the overriding need to protect people’s safety.”
Home Office minister Victoria Atkins addressed a now-viral photograph of one of the women who had been pinned down by police officers during an interview on Sky News on Sunday morning, saying it is “something that the police will have to explain in that report to the Home Secretary.”
Atkins added that the “very upsetting scenes” were being “taken very seriously” by the British government.
Her comments come as videos on social media and news agencies continue to surface, showing attendees scuffling with police.
Several UK leaders across party divides have agreed that the police response was disproportionately harsh, with the Mayor of London ordering “a full independent investigation of events yesterday evening and in previous days.”
In a statement on Twitter, Sadiq Khan also said he had spoken to the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner at City Hall on Sunday to have them explain what happened, saying that he was “not satisfied with the explanation they have provided.”
The Mayor said he had called on the government and police last week to “work with the organizers of the vigil to clarify the law and find a way for it to take place legally and safely,” and that he had received “assurances” from the Met that the vigil would be “policed sensitively.”
“In my view, this was not the case.” Khan said.
He called the scenes from Saturday evening “completely unacceptable,” and said that he “completely understands why women, girls and allies wanted to hold a vigil to remember Sarah and all women who have been subjected to violence or lost their lives at the hands of men, and to reclaim the public spaces where women are made to feel so unsafe.”
Labour Party leader Keir Starmer called the scenes in Clapham “deeply disturbing.”
“This was not the way to police this protest,” Starmer said.
The leaders of the Liberal Democrat party agreed, joining a growing chorus that have called on the Metropolitan Police Commissioner to resign. “Cressida Dick has lost the confidence of the millions of women in London and should resign,” said the Liberal Democrats, saying that the policing of the vigil were “utterly disgraceful and shame the Metropolitan Police.”
At a press conference on Saturday, Dick stood by the Met officers’ actions at the vigil, and said she would not resign.
“None of us wanted those scenes at the end of the vigil,” the police commissioner said.
UK Home Secretary Priti Patel said that “some” of the footage that was circulating online was “upsetting” and said she had asked the Met for a “full report on what happened.”
Patel’s comments, however, are unfolding in a landscape that’s become increasingly hostile to dissenting voices — one that disproportionately affects marginalized communities, including women.
The Home Secretary has made no bones about her plans to crack down on dissent, calling environmental protesters “eco-crusaders turned criminals” intent on attacking a British way of life and labeling the tactics of the Black Lives Matter demonstrators as “thuggery” in two different speeches last fall.
And while Patel has said the government will always “defend the right to protest,” her actions suggest otherwise.
Critics of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill 2021, which was introduced by Patel last week, say that the new law is intent on squashing the peaceful right to protest.
It’s a move that activists say underlines the government’s often-preferred solution of beefing up police funding and presence on the ground — when police have repeatedly abused the powers they already have, exemplified in the response to Everard’s vigil.
Patsy Stevenson, who was pinned down by Met officers on Saturday evening, has urged the public to shift the narrative away from the police and back to what happened to Everard, calling on the public to show their support on March 15 at London’s Parliament Square. Others have called for a Sunday vigil.